plan-review

To review an implementation plan for completeness and actionability, use a structured checklist that evaluates citation quality, verifies edge cases, and ensures clear execution steps. This categorizes issues by severity to provide actionable feedback for plan improvement.

Implementation plan review is a systematic assessment of a technical plan against predefined quality standards before execution. You need it when preparing to hand off a new feature plan to engineers, ensuring it is structured, verifiable, and ready for execution.

To check citation quality in a technical implementation plan, evaluate references against predefined standards to ensure all claims and technical dependencies are verifiable. This process identifies unsupported citations and categorizes them as issues for plan improvement.

Yes, you can use a structured checklist to assess if a plan is ready for execution by guiding the review through specific criteria across citation quality, completeness, and actionability. This generates standardized Markdown output that tracks readiness and highlights execution blockers.

To prioritize issues found during a plan review, assign severity levels ranging from Critical to Nitpick based on their impact on execution. This severity classification allows you to focus on resolving critical actionability and completeness gaps before minor adjustments.

The limitation of using a predefined checklist to review implementation plans is that it focuses strictly on citation quality, completeness, and actionability metrics. It may not capture subjective strategic misalignment or evaluate domain-specific technical feasibility outside these standard criteria.