Analyze plan findings in a forked context and generate a _plan-review.md.
npx skills add https://github.com/mcsdodo/kniha-jazd --skill plan-review-mcsdodo
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: plan-review Source: https://github.com/mcsdodo/kniha-jazd/tree/main/.claude/skills/plan-review-skill Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mcsdodo/kniha-jazd --skill plan-review-mcsdodo
Plan Review provides a structured, forked-context analysis to validate plans before committing implementation, reducing rework and misaligned expectations.
Feed the plan path to the skill and generate a _plan-review.md with findings and a recommendation.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Plan validation isolates your project plans in a forked context to analyze completeness, feasibility, and risks, returning a structured review document with actionable recommendations to reduce rework.
Reviewing project plans for risks works best by documenting findings iteratively up to four rounds, categorizing issues as Critical, Important, or Minor, and generating a structured markdown file for traceability.
Generate a plan review document by feeding the plan path into the review process, which analyzes the content in a forked context and outputs a _plan-review.md file containing findings and a final recommendation.
No, the plan review process uses a two-phase approach where analysis and documentation happen in an isolated forked context, ensuring only approved changes are later applied to the main context.
The iteration limit for analyzing and categorizing plan findings is four rounds, ensuring a structured yet bounded review process that captures critical, important, and minor issues effectively.
SwimmingLiuGather and persist project design context into a configuration file.
harishgovardhandamodarStructure git workflows with branching, atomic commits, and pre-commit checks.
ttmouseDecompose high-level tasks into actionable subtasks with dependency tracking.
brainbrewlabsReview implementation plans for completeness, feasibility, and quality.
