plan-review-rules

Automated plan-review governance applies predefined rules to evaluate architecture, dependencies, and risk in complex software plans. It enforces slot-driven checks from PROJECT-KNOWLEDGE.md to validate structure before approval.

Applying a formal decision matrix evaluates software architecture risk by enforcing governance rules and auto-escalating minor issues. It produces structured verdicts and actionable notes for coders based on dependency and risk analysis.

Automated rules can review complex multi-part software plans by validating structure, dependencies, and risk. The system loads plans from prompts and executes workflow checks to generate structured verdicts for reviewers.

Enforcing governance rules before approval requires applying standardized checks to evaluate architecture, dependencies, and risk. This approach ensures consistent and auditable decision-making through structured verdict outputs and actionable notes.

Auto-escalating minor issues during plan review uses a formal decision matrix to evaluate severity and enforce governance. The system automatically escalates minor architectural or dependency issues to ensure compliance before approval.

Generating structured verdicts for plan approvals involves executing plan-review workflows that apply predefined rules to architecture and dependencies. The system produces formal verdicts and actionable notes for coders to resolve.