plan-review

Review software project plans with Codex, Gemini, and Claude in parallel.

35|Updated Feb 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin --skill plan-review-sean-sunagaku
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-review
Source: https://github.com/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin/tree/main/plan-review/skills/plan-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sean-sunagaku/claude-code-plugin --skill plan-review-sean-sunagaku

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires claude, codex, gemini, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Plan review is automated by running Codex, Gemini, and Claude in parallel to validate the quality, completeness, and risks of planning documents before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel AI reviews: Simultaneously leverage Codex, Gemini, and Claude to assess plan quality, coverage, and potential gaps.
  • Integrated reporting: Produce a consolidated report that highlights strengths, gaps, and concrete improvements.
  • Plan validation workflow: Suitable for software project plans and technical plans to ensure alignment with requirements and risk mitigation.

Quick Start

Run /plan-review <path-to-plan> to start parallel reviews and generate a combined report.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a software project plan with multiple AI models in parallel?

Parallel AI plan review runs Codex, Gemini, and Claude simultaneously to assess software project plan quality, completeness, and risks. It generates individual reviews and an integrated report highlighting strengths, gaps, and improvements.

Can I use Claude, Codex, and Gemini together for code quality risk analysis?

Yes, Claude, Codex, and Gemini can be orchestrated together for code quality risk analysis. The multi-agent workflow applies automated evaluation prompts to validate planning documents and identify potential coverage gaps before implementation.

What is the best way to validate technical plan completeness before implementation?

Using a multi-agent orchestration workflow with automated evaluation prompts validates technical plan completeness. It produces individual AI reviews and an integrated consolidated report highlighting concrete improvements for requirements alignment.

Do I need a specific plan document format to generate an AI review report?

You need to provide a path to your plan document to generate an AI review report. The workflow reads the plan document to assess coverage, risk mitigation, and requirements alignment, outputting individual reviews plus a consolidated report.

Why use a parallel AI review instead of a single model for plan validation?

Parallel AI review leverages Codex, Gemini, and Claude simultaneously to provide diverse perspectives on plan quality and risk. This multi-agent approach produces an integrated report highlighting strengths and gaps a single model might miss.