plan-review

Documenting software implementation plans in a single markdown file involves structuring sections for problems, decisions, changes, tasks, and handoffs. This approach centralizes planning, preserves rationale, and enables inline review comments directly within the file.

The best way to track phase-based tasks and handoffs is using a phase-driven task system within a versioned markdown file. This provides a clear workflow from drafting to auditing, ensuring progress tracking and completed phase handoffs are auditable.

Yes, you can add inline review comments directly in a markdown planning document. This enables efficient critique and resolution of feedback without scattering conversations across separate documents, keeping the audit trail intact.

To resolve review feedback and audit decision history, you draft, review, and resolve comments sequentially in a versioned markdown file. This preserves tradeoffs and rationale for future maintainers in a single auditable location.

No, this markdown plan review workflow requires no external dependencies or specific platforms. It operates entirely by enforcing a structured markdown format with sections for problem, decisions, changes, tasks, and handoffs.