plan-review

To review an execution plan before coding, assess risks, map dependencies, and verify milestone alignment with proposals and specs. This structured plan evaluation outputs a verdict with findings and action items to ensure safe implementation.

A plan review is a structured assessment that identifies gaps, risks, and dependencies in a concrete execution plan. You need it for milestone-driven delivery when execution plans must trace to proposals, specs, ADRs, and test plans before implementation begins.

Check execution plan readiness by identifying tests to add or update and recording decisions as findings. A thorough plan evaluation verifies TDD readiness, maintainability, and alignment with architecture specs before you start coding.

Yes, assessing execution plan risks requires a complete plan file and related artifacts such as AGENTS.md and CONSTITUTION.md if present. These artifacts provide the context needed to map sequencing, rollback, and recovery strategies accurately.

The best way to find missing milestones is a self-contained plan evaluation that verifies context and validation steps against architecture specs. This process outputs a verdict highlighting missing milestones and recommended actions for implementation.

Automated execution plan verification relies on the completeness of submitted plan files and artifacts like ADRs. It cannot assess undocumented risks or missing proposals if those artifacts are absent, limiting its ability to trace full alignment in proposal-driven development.