skills.rest
giwa
giwaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

plan-reviewer

Review work plans for gaps and ambiguities with a PASS/FAIL verdict.

Updated Jan 31, 2026
Search Tags:#rollback#implementation#review#risk-assessment#plan-review#work-plan
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/giwa/codex-helper --skill plan-reviewer-giwa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/giwa/codex-helper/tree/main/skills/plan-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/giwa/codex-helper --skill plan-reviewer-giwa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a ruthlessly critical plan review workflow to ensure work plans are complete, verifiable, and free of gaps before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Formalized review process: Enforces four evaluation criteria (clarity, verifiability, completeness, big picture) and a standard 7-section prompt for delegation or execution.
  • Pre-implementation risk mitigation: Identifies missing details, dependencies, and rollback strategies to prevent wasted effort.
  • Structured feedback: Produces concrete, prioritized improvements teams can act on prior to starting work.

Quick Start

Use this skill to trigger a Plan Reviewer assessment on a new implementation plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a work plan to identify gaps before implementation?▼

A work plan review identifies gaps and ambiguities by analyzing plan content, dependencies, constraints, and acceptance criteria to produce a clear PASS/FAIL verdict with concrete improvements.

What is the best way to assess implementation risks and missing rollback strategies in a project plan?▼

Implementation risk assessment applies a ruthlessly critical framework to evaluate plan completeness and verifiability, ensuring missing details, dependencies, and rollback strategies are identified prior to execution.

How do I evaluate acceptance criteria and dependencies for a flawless execution plan?▼

Evaluating acceptance criteria and dependencies requires enforcing four criteria—clarity, verifiability, completeness, and big picture—to produce structured, prioritized feedback teams can act on immediately.

Can I use a standardized review framework to generate actionable feedback for implementation teams?▼

Yes, a standardized 7-section prompt enforces formalized evaluation criteria to generate concrete, prioritized improvements suitable for direct handoff to implementation teams.

Does a critical plan review prevent wasted effort during project execution?▼

Pre-implementation risk mitigation prevents wasted effort by identifying missing details and rollback strategies, ensuring work plans are complete, verifiable, and free of gaps before starting.

What are the limitations of using an automated plan reviewer for gap analysis?▼

Automated plan review relies entirely on analyzing provided plan content, dependencies, and constraints, meaning it cannot detect undocumented external risks or unlisted implicit dependencies.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
daffy0208daffy0208
34

Orchestration Planner

Convert high-level goals into executable HTN plans with capability matching and precondition validation.

Community
Advanced
LordKuperLordKuper

architecture-review

Analyze GDD requirements against ADR decisions to produce a traceability matrix and verdict.

Community
Advanced
ngocsangyemngocsangyem
14

meow:plan-creator

Draft gate-driven planning documents with YAML frontmatter and acceptance criteria for MeowKit implementations.

Community
Advanced
Kushal9889Kushal9889

learn

Manage and review project learnings with Bash scripting.

Community
Advanced