plan-reviewer

Plan validation involves performing structured reviews to identify gaps across completeness, correctness, feasibility, risk, tradeoffs, consistency, and testability. You provide a plan document containing a High-Level Objective, Low-Level Tasks, Context, and Validation Gates for automated cross-checking of dependencies and constraints.

A structured plan review requires your architecture proposal or deployment roadmap to include a High-Level Objective, Low-Level Tasks, Context, and Validation Gates. The review cross-checks referenced files, dependencies, and constraints to ensure engineering implementations meet quality and feasibility standards.

Automated plan reviews are applicable to module roadmaps and design reviews at various maturity levels and project sizes. The process enforces the presence of required plan file sections and evaluates dimensional completeness to provide actionable findings and formal approval recommendations.

Assessing risks and tradeoffs in a technical design document requires a dimensional evaluation covering Completeness, Correctness, Feasibility, Risk, Tradeoffs, Consistency, and Testability. This structured review approach returns a formatted assessment with recommended actions to resolve identified gaps.

Engineering plan reviews fail automated entry criteria checks when the plan file is missing required sections like a High-Level Objective, Low-Level Tasks, Context, or Validation Gates. The review also fails if it cannot cross-check referenced files, dependencies, and constraints within the document.

Performing a structured design review for a component plan requires ingesting the document and running dimensional evaluations for quality assurance and traceability. The review validates referenced files and dependencies, returning a formatted assessment with actionable findings and formal approval recommendations.