planner-benchmarking

Benchmark Nav2 planner performance across fixed start/goal pairs using logs or rosbag data.

18|2|Updated Apr 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wimblerobotics/ros2-copilot-skills --skill planner-benchmarking
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: planner-benchmarking
Source: https://github.com/wimblerobotics/ros2-copilot-skills/tree/main/planner-benchmarking
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wimblerobotics/ros2-copilot-skills --skill planner-benchmarking

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Benchmark Nav2 planner performance across multiple scenarios to help engineers compare planners, quantify impact of changes, and identify bottlenecks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Measure planning time, path length, smoothness, reversals, and planner success rate using logs, rosbag data, and simulated scenarios.
  • Run repeatable experiments across fixed start/goal pairs and scenarios to build reproducible benchmarks.
  • Use case: Compare Nav2 planners (e.g., SMAC, NavFn, Hybrid A*) under identical maps to guide planner selection and tuning.

Quick Start

Run a benchmark to measure planning time, path length, and planner quality across predefined start/goal pairs.

Frequently Asked Questions about planner-benchmarking

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I benchmark Nav2 planner performance across multiple scenarios?

You can benchmark Nav2 planners by measuring planning time, path length, and success rate across fixed start/goal pairs. Repeated trials using logs or rosbag data generate reproducible metrics for comparing planner behavior.

What metrics should I track when comparing ROS 2 path planning algorithms?

Track planning time, path length, smoothness, reversals, and planner success rate. These metrics quantify changes and identify bottlenecks across different fixed scenarios.

Do I need a ROS 2 environment with rosbag data to evaluate planner success rate?

Yes, evaluating planner success rate requires a ROS 2 environment with Nav2, costmaps, and access to logs or rosbag data to compute the metrics accurately.

What is the best way to compare SMAC, NavFn, and Hybrid A* planners under identical maps?

Run repeatable experiments across predefined start/goal pairs on identical maps. This ensures consistent benchmarking conditions to guide planner selection and tuning.

Why does my Nav2 planner benchmark lack reproducibility across test runs?

Benchmarks lack reproducibility without fixed start/goal pairs and repeated trials. Standardizing scenarios and using consistent log or rosbag data ensures reliable measurement of planning time and path length.