planning-review-criteria

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the review of DISCUSS artefacts (stories, acceptance criteria, sprint plans) by providing a structured, automated review process for INVEST quality, planning coherence, and DoR compliance.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Automated Review: Applies formal gate definitions and scoring rubric for INVEST criteria, planning coherence, and DoR compliance.
• Customizable Lenses: Includes independent reviewer lenses for quality-gates, architecture-boundaries, test-integrity, and cold-reader.
• Discipline Skills: Utilizes Outside-In TDD, Clean Architecture, BDD/Gherkin, mutation testing, contract testing, and ADR.
• Mechanical Guardrails: Implements fail-closed hooks (G1–G8) to prevent out-of-sequence dispatch, unloaded skills, and unverified progress.
• Multi-Harness Portability: Applies the same guardrails across Claude Code, Copilot CLI, and Cursor.
• Token Economy: Supports state write-through model and model routing by cost class.
• Use Case: Ideal for software development teams to validate stories before entering the DESIGN phase, ensuring high-quality and compliant artefacts.

Quick Start

To review the DISCUSS artefact 'story.md', execute the planning-review-criteria skill.