platonic-code-review

Spec-to-code alignment is verified by cross-referencing implementation against RFCs, requirements, and design documents to identify discrepancies and ensure completeness. This process generates structured review reports containing evidence references and actionable recommendations.

Gap analysis in code review identifies missing features or discrepancies between project specifications and the actual code implementation. It ensures completeness and consistency during design audits and implementation verification.

Evidence-driven code review reports are generated by analyzing the codebase against stated requirements and design decisions. The resulting structured reports include code references and actionable recommendations for compliance verification.

Automated spec-to-code review can be performed without modifying source code. The process focuses on verification and gap analysis, generating structured reports with evidence references and actionable recommendations instead of altering the implementation.

Specification verification is needed during RFC reviews, design audits, and implementation verification to ensure codebases conform to project specifications. It reduces gaps and misalignments between stated requirements and actual implementation.

The best way to perform a design audit is to cross-reference design documents and RFCs against the codebase to validate spec-to-code alignment. This generates structured reports with evidence references highlighting missing features and discrepancies.