What problem does it solve? Reviewing SaaS and cloud master subscription agreements clause-by-clause without a firm playbook leads to inconsistent positions, missed one-sided terms, and redlines that drift from approved language. This Skill gives the reviewer firm-approved positions, fallback text, and unacceptable-term red lines for every major clause type in a US-law SaaS MSA. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Approved clause text: Byte-exact firm-approved replacement language for availability/SLAs, customer data ownership, security obligations, suspension rights, liability caps and carve-outs, and term/renewal/termination, ready to paste into a redline tool. - Conditional fallbacks: Approved fallback formulations that apply only when a stated condition is met (e.g., counterparty rejects a chronic-failure termination right and the service is not business-critical). - Side-aware calibration: Per-clause position notes describing how customer-side and vendor-side asks diverge from the balanced baseline, anchored to published market standards (Bonterms Cloud Terms, Common Paper Cloud Service Agreement). - Use Case: While redlining a vendor's SaaS agreement, you find the liability section caps data-protection breaches at one month of fees. The playbook flags this as unacceptable and supplies the approved 12-month general cap with a 3x enhanced cap for security and data breaches. ## Quick Start Review this SaaS master subscription agreement against the firm playbook and propose redlines using the approved clause text for any position that falls short.
