plugin-dev-validation

Define and enforce domain validation criteria for plugin components during artifact review.

Updated Jan 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ddaanet/edify-plugin --skill plugin-dev-validation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plugin-dev-validation
Source: https://github.com/ddaanet/edify-plugin/tree/main/skills/plugin-dev-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ddaanet/edify-plugin --skill plugin-dev-validation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill defines and enforces domain validation criteria for plugin components during artifact review, ensuring consistency and safety across the corrector's checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Frontmatter validation: requires name, description, and contextual fields to drive discovery and configuration.
  • Structure and progressive disclosure: guides reviewers from simple to complex patterns, with guided sections and examples.
  • Security and quality guardrails: encodes rules to prevent ambiguous or unsafe artifact evaluation and to promote repeatable reviews.
  • Integration with workflow: aligns with planner, runbook, corrector, and handoff stages to standardize reviews.

Quick Start

Review a plugin component using the defined criteria to validate its frontmatter, structure, and security patterns.

Frequently Asked Questions about plugin-dev-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate frontmatter and structure for plugin components?

You validate plugin components by enforcing domain criteria that check frontmatter requirements, structure organization, and security patterns to guide automated checks and human reviews.

What frontmatter fields are required for plugin artifact review?

Required frontmatter fields include name, description, and contextual fields necessary to drive discovery and configuration during the plugin component artifact review process.

How do I enforce security and quality guardrails during plugin reviews?

Security and quality guardrails encode rules to prevent ambiguous or unsafe artifact evaluation, promoting repeatable reviews by standardizing checks across corrector and planner workflows.

Does plugin validation work with Skills, Agents, Hooks, and Commands?

Domain validation criteria apply directly to Skills, Agents, Hooks, Commands, and Plugin Structure workflows, standardizing reviews across all these component types within corrector processes.

How do I integrate domain validation criteria into a planner and corrector workflow?

Validation criteria align with planner, runbook, corrector, and handoff stages to standardize reviews, ensuring consistent artifact evaluation throughout the entire plugin development workflow.

What are the limitations of automated plugin component validation?

Automated validation focuses on frontmatter, structure, and security patterns but requires human review for complex contextual judgments, ensuring repeatable and safe artifact evaluation across workflows.