What problem does it solve? Product managers often face recurring judgment calls—whether a requirement is real, whether a feature should be built, how to cut an MVP—without a structured way to pressure-test their thinking. This Skill routes each question to the right expert lens (Marty Cagan, Teresa Torres, Yu Jun) or methodology (The Mom Test, User Story Mapping, Escaping the Build Trap), and can convene a multi-expert review panel that outputs consensus, disagreements, and conditional conclusions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Routing Mode: Classifies the question type (requirement validation, prioritization, MVP slicing, discovery habits, strategy deployment) and recommends 1-2 experts or methodologies with reasons tied to specific mental models. - Review Panel Mode: For major or irreversible decisions, spawns parallel expert reviews and produces structured minutes covering consensus, disagreements, per-expert advice, methodology checks, conditional conclusions, and blind spots. - Prebuilt Disagreement Map: Surfaces known tensions between schools of thought (e.g., quantified value calculation vs. iterative discovery) so conclusions stay conditional rather than vague compromises. - Use Case: A PM unsure whether a requested feature is a real need pastes the requirement; the Skill routes it to The Mom Test for signal validation and Yu Jun's value formula for switching-cost analysis, then delivers a grounded verdict. ## Quick Start Ask the product advisory board to review whether this requirement is a real user need and which experts should weigh in.
