What problem does it solve? When product discussions stall on vague goals, patchwork solutions, or conflicting mental models, this Skill forces structured meta-thinking: it surfaces the most dangerous premise, finds counterexamples, and proposes genuinely different product models instead of rephrasing what was already said. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Premise Challenge: Identifies the most dangerous assumption behind a direction and states what evidence would overturn it. - Judgment Model Building: Structures each session into a judgment statement, a fact/constraint/truth-source/assumption ledger, decision criteria, and model axes. - Real Fork Alternatives: Only when a true product-model fork exists, presents 2-3 alternatives with conditions, costs, and a recommendation, then stops for the PM to decide. - Use Case: A PM says "this design feels wrong, it's just repeating my words." The Skill reconstructs context, reframes the question as a judgment sentence, exposes the hidden premise, and returns concrete conclusions to the design workflow. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run /pmai-meta to deeply challenge the current product direction and find its blind spots.
