poc-workflow

Standardize Proof of Concept workflows with directory structures and documentation templates.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nishio-n0522/test_updated_sdd --skill poc-workflow
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: poc-workflow
Source: https://github.com/nishio-n0522/test_updated_sdd/tree/main/.claude/skills/poc-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nishio-n0522/test_updated_sdd --skill poc-workflow

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a standardized framework and guidelines for conducting Proofs of Concept (PoCs), ensuring consistency in technical validation and reporting.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Standardized Directory Structure: Enforces a consistent layout for PoC code and documentation (poc/{technology_name}/).
  • Template-Driven Documentation: Offers templates for overview.md, findings.md, and design-pattern.md to guide PoC reporting.
  • Evaluation Criteria Design: Provides guidance on defining objective and subjective evaluation criteria for PoCs.
  • Use Case: When evaluating a new database technology for potential adoption, use this Skill to structure the PoC, document the setup, record performance findings, and compare it against predefined criteria.

Quick Start

Use the poc-workflow skill to create a new PoC for the 'redis' technology.

Frequently Asked Questions about poc-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a proof of concept for new technology evaluation?

Structure a proof of concept using a standardized directory layout like poc/{technology_name}/ to organize code and documentation templates such as overview.md and findings.md for consistent technical validation.

What documentation do I need for a technical validation PoC?

Technical validation PoC documentation requires overview.md for setup, findings.md for performance results, and design-pattern.md to guide reporting and ensure consistent evaluation of new technologies.

How do I define evaluation criteria for a proof of concept?

Define evaluation criteria for a proof of concept by outlining objective and subjective metrics tailored to the technology, facilitating consistent technical validation and standardized reporting for new technology adoption.

When should I use a standardized PoC workflow instead of ad-hoc testing?

Use a standardized PoC workflow when evaluating new database technologies for potential adoption to enforce consistent directory structures, template-driven documentation, and objective evaluation criteria for reliable reporting.

Can I use this proof of concept framework for any technology evaluation?

Yes, this proof of concept framework applies to any technology evaluation by enforcing a consistent poc/{technology_name}/ directory structure and providing adaptable templates for documenting setup, findings, and design patterns.