policy-monitor

Crawl AI policy outputs and triage drift against approved commitments.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill policy-monitor-gtgspot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: policy-monitor
Source: https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal/tree/main/ai-governance-legal/skills/policy-monitor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill policy-monitor-gtgspot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps legal and compliance teams detect when AI policies, practices, and use cases drift away from approved commitments, enabling timely updates and governance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Sweep weekly AI policy outputs folder and compare against the current CLAUDE.md policy commitments.
  • Flag gaps in use-case coverage, vendor data terms, and disclosure requirements, and generate suggested language.
  • Answer direct queries about whether a proposed new practice is covered by policy, and provide registry guidance.

Quick Start

Run policy-monitor to perform a weekly sweep of outputs and report any policy gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about policy-monitor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect AI policy drift in internal documentation?

AI policy drift is detected by crawling output artifacts and triaging results against approved use cases to keep AI governance aligned with current commitments. This process flags gaps in use-case coverage, vendor data terms, and disclosure requirements automatically.

What is AI policy drift and when should I monitor for compliance gaps?

AI policy drift occurs when deployed AI practices and use cases diverge from approved legal commitments. You should monitor for compliance gaps during weekly sweeps, direct policy queries, or when assessing new vendor reviews and internal documentation updates.

How do I check if a proposed AI use case is covered by existing legal policy?

To check if a proposed AI use case is covered, run a direct query against your approved use case registry. The system provides registry guidance and flags coverage gaps, generating suggested language for any missing policy commitments.

Do I need a configured policy file to monitor AI governance compliance?

Yes, monitoring AI governance compliance requires a configured CLAUDE policy file, an outputs folder with artifacts, and a registry of approved use cases. These elements are diffed against each other to identify policy gaps and vendor review issues.

Can I automate weekly compliance sweeps for AI vendor reviews and use cases?

Yes, you can automate weekly compliance sweeps to crawl the AI policy outputs folder and compare artifacts against current policy commitments. This automated triage flags gaps in vendor data terms and disclosure requirements.

What is the best way to flag gaps in AI use-case coverage and disclosure requirements?

The best way to flag gaps in AI use-case coverage and disclosure requirements is to diff output artifacts against a registry of approved use cases. This drift detection mechanism generates suggested language to resolve policy gaps.