policy-redraft

Generate a marked-up policy redraft proposal with inline change rationales.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill policy-redraft-gtgspot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: policy-redraft
Source: https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal/tree/main/regulatory-legal/skills/policy-redraft
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill policy-redraft-gtgspot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill produces a proposed marked-up policy redraft to close a gap identified by policy-diff or gap tracker, ensuring the redraft does not modify the original source and is suitable for internal review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gap-driven redrafting: Generates a smallest-possible redraft with inline [verify] tags and commentary to justify changes.
  • Proposal-first workflow: Writes outputs to a new file named [policy-name]-proposed-redraft-[YYYY-MM-DD].md and does not alter source policy or close gaps.
  • Matter-aware context: Supports matter-workspace context and applies context as needed, if enabled.

Quick Start

Provide the gap reference, the current policy text, and the rule text to generate the redraft proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions about policy-redraft

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a policy redraft to close a compliance gap?

To generate a policy redraft, provide the latest approved policy text, the active gap entry, and the current rule text. The system produces a clearly labeled proposed redraft file with inline change rationales and [verify] annotations.

What is a proposal-first workflow for internal policy review?

A proposal-first workflow creates a marked-up redraft in a new file without altering the original source policy. It ensures changes are clearly labeled as proposals suitable for internal review before approval.

Can I use gap analysis results for matter-specific policy redrafting?

Yes, gap analysis results can be used for matter-specific policy redrafting. The process supports matter-workspace context, applying context as needed to generate the smallest-possible redraft to close identified gaps.

How do I ensure the original policy text is not overwritten during redrafting?

The original policy text is protected by writing outputs to a new file named [policy-name]-proposed-redraft-[YYYY-MM-DD].md. This ensures the source policy remains unmodified and gaps stay open during internal review.

What annotations are included in a marked-up policy redraft proposal?

A marked-up policy redraft proposal includes inline commentary to justify changes and [verify] annotations. These elements highlight where manual verification is needed before finalizing the policy updates.