What problem does it solve? When a regulatory gap analysis identifies that an internal policy no longer matches a current rule, someone still has to draft the fix. This Skill produces a marked-up redraft of the affected policy section as a reviewable proposal, without ever touching the approved source document or prematurely closing the gap in the tracker. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Marked-up redrafts with rationale: Produces redlined policy sections (struck and inserted text) where every change carries an inline comment citing the rule, the citation, and the gap being closed. - Rule currency verification: Checks whether the underlying regulation is still in force (delays, stays, injunctions, rescissions) and emits a prominent warning banner when status cannot be verified. - Strict proposal guardrails: Writes output only to a clearly dated draft file like [policy-name]-proposed-redraft-[YYYY-MM-DD].md, never edits source policies, and never closes gaps in the tracker. - Use Case: After running a gap analysis that flags your data retention policy as conflicting with a new 14-day regulatory cap, invoke this Skill with the gap ID to receive a redraft memo showing the smallest possible edit, a change summary table, and a pre-application checklist for the policy owner. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to redraft the policy section for a specific gap by saying something like: redraft the data retention policy to close gap GAP-014 from the tracker.
