policy-redraft

Generate a marked policy redraft that closes a compliance gap.

183|37|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill policy-redraft-zhou210712
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: policy-redraft
Source: https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH/tree/main/regulatory-legal/skills/policy-redraft
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill policy-redraft-zhou210712

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps turn identified regulatory or policy gaps into a minimally edited, review-ready policy redraft that clearly marks what to verify, instead of risking direct changes to already approved policy documents.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gap-to-draft redrafting workflow: Takes a specific GAP (or gap description) plus the current approved policy text and relevant regulation text, then produces a targeted redraft for only the affected sections.
  • Regulation validity checking: Verifies the referenced regulation’s status (e.g., delayed/pending, amended, suspended, revoked) using the same mode as upstream policy-diff outputs.
  • Marked, internal-review deliverables: Produces a new file named with a proposed redraft suffix and embeds [需核实] tags (including review-critical dates/thresholds/requirements) to support safe internal governance.

Use Case: A compliance team finds a mismatch between an internal policy and an applicable regulatory update; this skill generates a proposed redraft memo and a marked policy section patch without closing the gap in the tracker.

Quick Start

Provide a GAP-ID and the current approved policy text plus the regulation text (or the policy-diff extracted regulation), then ask for a redraft using policy-redraft’s workflow guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions about policy-redraft

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft policy revisions to close compliance gaps without altering the approved source document?

Policy redrafting generates a marked proposed policy redraft that closes a specific compliance gap without editing the approved source policy. It outputs a new draft file containing pervasive [需核实] tags to support safe internal governance review.

What inputs do I need to generate a marked policy redraft for internal review?

Generating a policy redraft requires collecting specific gap details, current approved policy text with version confirmation, and applicable regulation text. These inputs validate regulation status and produce a minimally updated, review-ready draft file.

How does regulation validity checking work during the policy redrafting workflow?

Regulation validity checking verifies the referenced regulation's current status, such as delayed, pending, amended, suspended, or revoked. It uses the same mode as upstream policy-diff outputs to ensure the policy redraft relies on currently active regulatory text.

Can I use policy-diff findings to create a targeted policy section patch?

Yes, policy-diff findings can be converted into structured regulatory text to produce a targeted redraft for only the affected policy sections. This workflow generates a proposed redraft memo and a marked section patch without closing the original gap in the tracker.

What do the [需核实] tags in the redrafted policy output mean?

The [需核实] tags in the redrafted policy output mark review-critical dates, thresholds, and requirements needing verification. They are embedded throughout the new draft file to ensure compliance teams check specific details before approving any policy changes.

When should I avoid direct edits to an approved policy and use a redraft workflow instead?

You should use a policy redraft workflow instead of direct edits when a compliance gap is discovered between an internal policy and a regulatory update, and the approved source policy must remain untouched during internal review. This safely proposes changes with marked revisions.