post-referee

Resolves code-review disputes by inspecting cited source files and producing findings reports.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude --skill post-referee
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: post-referee
Source: https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude/tree/main/skills/pst-referee
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude --skill post-referee

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Neutral arbiter that independently verifies finder and challenger claims, producing final findings report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent adjudication: Reads each cited file:line and forms a ruling based on the evidence.
  • Structured outputs: Produces per-finding rulings plus a consolidated audit report.
  • Use Case: When two parties dispute a finding in a code base, this skill adjudicates and documents the final findings with evidence.

Quick Start

Load the cited source files, read them with surrounding context, and render a final findings report with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about post-referee

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify disputed code review findings with line-precise citations?

To verify disputed code review findings, an independent arbiter reads each cited file and line to inspect the actual source code, forming a ruling based on the evidence with line-precise citations.

What is the process for adjudicating conflicting code audit claims?

Adjudicating conflicting code audit claims involves independently verifying evidence from both finder and challenger by reading cited source files, then producing structured per-finding rulings and a consolidated audit summary.

How do I generate a final findings report for disputed codebase evidence?

You generate a final findings report by loading the cited source files, reading them with surrounding context, and rendering a structured report that documents each verified finding with evidence.

Can I use independent adjudication for audit scenarios with multiple conflicting parties?

Yes, independent adjudication is designed for code-review or audit scenarios where a finder and challenger present conflicting evidence, resolving disputes by inspecting the actual source files.

What are the limitations of using an automated arbiter for source-file inspection?

The primary limitation is that the adjudication process strictly requires each cited file and line to be loaded and read, meaning it cannot rule on evidence that lacks precise file:line citations.