ppw:logic

Name: ppw:logic
Availability: InStock
Author: Chanw-research

Trace argument chains and detect logical inconsistencies across paper sections.

38|3|Updated May 7, 2026

Search Tags:#terminology #academic-writing #contradictions #paper-review #logical-consistency #claim-evidence #argument-chain

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill ppw-logic-chanw-research

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ppw:logic
Source: https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing/tree/main/skills/writing-polish/paper-polish-workflow/.claude/skills/ppw-logic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill ppw-logic-chanw-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Verify logical consistency across paper sections. Traces argument chains and identifies gaps, unsupported claims, terminology inconsistencies, and number contradictions. 论文逻辑验证，识别论证链断裂、无支撑声明、术语不一致、数字矛盾。

Core Features & Use Cases

Trace argument chains from Introduction through Conclusion and flag gaps or contradictions.
Detect unsupported claims and terminology inconsistencies, with bilingual summaries.
Generate a two-part bilingual report: an Argument Chain View and a categorized issue list.

Quick Start

Submit the full manuscript (or paste the paper) to run a direct full-paper logic check and generate the bilingual report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ppw:logic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I check my research paper for logical consistency and argument gaps?▼

You can check logical consistency by submitting your full manuscript to trace the argument chain from Introduction through Conclusion. The system detects argument gaps, unsupported claims, terminology inconsistencies, and numerical contradictions.

What is an argument chain view in academic writing review?▼

An argument chain view maps the logical flow across standard research paper sections to identify gaps or contradictions. It traces claims and evidence from the Introduction through the Conclusion to verify the argumentation holds.

How do I detect unsupported claims and terminology inconsistencies in my manuscript?▼

Run a full-paper logic check on your standard research manuscript to detect unsupported claims and terminology inconsistencies. The analysis categorizes these issues and generates a bilingual summary report for your review.

Can I verify logical consistency in a paper without separating it into individual sections?▼

Yes, you can verify logical consistency by submitting the full manuscript directly without separating it into individual sections. The analysis processes the entire document to identify cross-section argument gaps and contradictions.

What types of logical contradictions can be detected in a standard research manuscript?▼

Detectable logical contradictions in a standard research manuscript include argument chain gaps, unsupported claims, terminology inconsistencies, and numerical contradictions. The analysis outputs a categorized bilingual issue list detailing these specific logical problems.

Does the paper logic check work for non-standard research formats?▼

The paper logic check is specifically designed for standard research manuscripts with sections from Introduction through Conclusion. Non-standard formats may not yield accurate results because the argument chain tracing relies on this conventional structure.