pr-driver

Generate review-ready PR bodies with branch naming and commit templates.

Updated Aug 23, 2026

Search Tags:#git #pr #risk-management #code-review #quality-gates #pull-request #test-plan

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/matthabermehl/generation-b-kids-books --skill pr-driver

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-driver
Source: https://github.com/matthabermehl/generation-b-kids-books/tree/main/.codex/skills/pr-driver
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/matthabermehl/generation-b-kids-books --skill pr-driver

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps engineering teams produce consistent, review-ready PRs for completed work, reducing manual drafting time and ensuring quality gates are satisfied.

Core Features & Use Cases

Deterministic PR descriptions with clear changes, rationale, and test plans.
Enforced branch naming and commit message templates for traceability.
Ready-to-submit PR bodies with structured sections for reviewers and stakeholders.

Quick Start

Create a clean branch and PR body by feeding the task evidence to the PR driver.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-driver

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate pull request creation with structured test plans and risk sections?▼

Automating pull request creation involves feeding completed task evidence into a generator that enforces quality gates, requiring structured descriptions, test plans, and risk sections to output a ready-to-submit PR body.

What is the best way to enforce consistent git branch naming and commit message templates?▼

Enforcing consistent git branch naming and commit messages requires applying a deterministic template that traces completed tasks across branches, ensuring review-ready pull requests with standardized commit histories.

How does a quality gate workflow ensure my code review is ready for stakeholders?▼

A quality gate workflow ensures code review readiness by enforcing requirements for descriptions, test plans, and risks, producing a structured PR body that provides clear rationale and changes for stakeholders.

Can I generate a review-ready PR body directly from completed development tasks?▼

Yes, you can generate a review-ready PR body directly from completed tasks by feeding task evidence into an automated driver that drafts descriptions, test plans, and risks for submission.

Do I need to manually draft pull request descriptions if I use a deterministic PR template?▼

No, using a deterministic PR template eliminates manual drafting by automatically structuring your changes, rationale, and test plans into a clean, review-ready pull request body.

When should I not use automated PR generation for my git workflow?▼

Automated PR generation should be avoided when a task lacks completed evidence or has not passed quality gates, as the process strictly enforces requirements for descriptions, tests, and risks before outputting a PR body.