pr-fix

Analyze pull request diffs across correctness, security, errors, and tests with confidence-scored findings.

6|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/withpiper/pipekit --skill pr-fix-withpiper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-fix
Source: https://github.com/withpiper/pipekit/tree/main/skills/pr-fix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/withpiper/pipekit --skill pr-fix-withpiper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Precision PR reviews across four dimensions to surface issues, reduce noise, and guide targeted remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Diff-based review across correctness, security, errors, and tests with confidence-gated findings and deduplication.
  • Interactive discussion and guided remediation workflow that produces small, user-approved fixes with clear rationale.
  • Works with standard PR workflows, supports routing decisions, and ensures repeatable, auditable results.

Quick Start

Submit a PR and run /pr-fix to start the guided review and remediation workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-fix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request code reviews for correctness and security?

Automated pull request code review analyzes diffs across correctness, security, errors, and tests dimensions. It applies confidence-scored findings and deduplication to surface issues and reduce noise, guiding targeted remediation for verifiable fixes.

How does a guided remediation workflow apply fixes to a pull request?

Guided remediation workflow facilitates interactive discussions to produce small, user-approved fixes with clear rationale. It enforces a deterministic, per-fix commit workflow with validation gates to drive verifiable fixes in standard PR workflows.

Can I use confidence scoring to filter code review findings on a diff?

Confidence scoring filters code review findings by gating issues based on calculated certainty. This deduplication mechanism routes issues across four dimensions, ensuring repeatable and auditable results by focusing only on high-confidence findings.

What is the best way to ensure repeatable and auditable PR review results?

Repeatable and auditable PR review results are ensured through a reference-driven checklist approach with per-dimension scoring. Routing decisions and interactive discussion support standard workflows, producing structured, verifiable fixes.

Does the PR review workflow support routing decisions for identified issues?

The PR review workflow supports routing decisions for identified issues across correctness, security, errors, and tests. This structured approach manages diffs and facilitates interactive discussions to drive targeted remediation.

When should I use a structured PR review instead of manual code inspection?

Structured PR review should be used when you need to surface issues across correctness, security, errors, and tests with confidence-gated findings. It reduces noise compared to manual inspection by providing per-dimension scoring and a guided remediation workflow.