skills.rest
marxbiotech
marxbiotechOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

pr-review-and-document

Run multiple review agents and post structured results as a PR comment.

Updated Jan 26, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#developer tools#code review#documentation#github#pr review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/marxbiotech/pr-review-toolkit --skill pr-review-and-document
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review-and-document
Source: https://github.com/marxbiotech/pr-review-toolkit/tree/main/skills/pr-review-and-document
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/marxbiotech/pr-review-toolkit --skill pr-review-and-document

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of conducting comprehensive code reviews for Pull Requests and documenting the findings directly as a PR comment, ensuring clear communication and a traceable review history.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive PR Review: Executes a multi-agent review covering code quality, simplification, error handling, type design, test coverage, and comments.
  • Structured Commenting: Formats review results into a clear, organized PR comment with metadata, summaries, issue details, strengths, and action plans.
  • Cache-Aware Operations: Utilizes caching for PR numbers and review comments to improve efficiency and reduce API calls.
  • Use Case: After pushing changes to a feature branch, you can invoke this Skill to get a detailed review and have it posted as a comment on the corresponding PR, ready for team feedback.

Quick Start

Please review this PR and document the results.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review-and-document

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate PR review and post the results as a GitHub comment?▼

To automate PR review, this Skill executes multiple specialized agents to analyze code quality, simplification, error handling, and test coverage, then formats the structured results and posts them directly as a GitHub PR comment.

What does automated code review check for in a pull request?▼

Automated code review checks pull requests for code quality, potential simplifications, silent failures, type design flaws, test coverage, and comment quality by running mandatory, specialized review agents.

How do I document pull request findings directly on GitHub?▼

You document pull request findings by running a multi-agent review that formats structured metadata, issue details, strengths, and action plans, then automatically updates or creates a PR comment on GitHub.

Can I use this to review a specific pull request by number?▼

Yes, you can review a specific pull request by number, as the process handles PR number identification and utilizes caching for PR numbers and review comments to reduce API calls.

Does the PR review process overwrite existing comments on GitHub?▼

No, the PR review process checks for existing comments before posting; it intelligently updates the existing PR comment with the latest structured review results or creates a new one if none exists.

What is the best way to analyze test coverage and type design in a PR?▼

The best way to analyze test coverage and type design is using a multi-agent review process that deploys specialized analyzers to evaluate these aspects alongside code quality and error handling.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
bossjonesbossjones
1

fetch-diff

Fetch GitHub pull request diffs with line numbers and file filtering.

Community
Advanced
OmniNode-aiOmniNode-ai
3

ticket-pipeline

Orchestrates autonomous software ticket resolution pipeline integrating Linear, GitHub, and Slack.

Official
Advanced
KrismithReddy12KrismithReddy12

health

Calculate a weighted 0-10 code quality score from linters and test runners.

Community
Advanced
mqzkimmqzkim

quality-gate

Validate agent-generated code, content, and deployments against quality standards.

Community
Intermediate