skills.rest
chicongst
chicongstCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

pr-review

Evaluate pull requests for scope, risk, test coverage, and clarity.

2|Updated Mar 16, 2026
Search Tags:#testing#documentation#quality#risk-assessment#code-review#pull-request#pr-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/chicongst/agent-skills-installer --skill pr-review-chicongst
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/chicongst/agent-skills-installer/tree/main/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/chicongst/agent-skills-installer --skill pr-review-chicongst

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Pull request reviews that ensure scope control, risk awareness, test coverage, and clear changes before merge, reducing defects and delivery risk.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Assess Change Scope and Risk: Ensure PRs do one thing, assess blast radius, and verify reversibility.
  • Verify Test Coverage: Confirm new/updated tests exist and that existing tests remain green.
  • Check Change Clarity: Ensure diff is understandable, description explains WHAT changed and WHY, and changes are well documented.
  • Use Case: A team uses PR Review to enforce small, well-scoped changes with thorough checks before merging.

Quick Start

Provide the PR details or diff and instruct the PR Reviewer to evaluate scope, risk, tests, and clarity.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I ensure my pull request has adequate test coverage and documentation before merging?▼

To ensure pull request test coverage and documentation, provide your PR diff to the reviewer to evaluate missing tests, verify existing tests remain green, and check that descriptions explain what changed and why.

What does a checklist-driven code review evaluate for change scope and risk?▼

A checklist-driven code review evaluates change scope and risk by ensuring the pull request does one thing, assessing its blast radius, and verifying its reversibility to reduce delivery risk and defects.

Can I use an automated PR review workflow for both small and large pull requests?▼

Yes, you can use this PR review workflow for both small and large pull requests across multiple repositories and teams, ensuring consistent quality through a checklist-driven analysis of scope, risk, and clarity.

What is the best way to assess pull request blast radius and reversibility?▼

The best way to assess pull request blast radius and reversibility is to apply a checklist-driven analysis that verifies the changes are well-scoped, understandable, and provide concrete remediation guidance if issues arise.

How do I get concrete remediation guidance for an unclear code diff?▼

To get concrete remediation guidance for an unclear code diff, submit the pull request details to the reviewer to check change clarity, identify missing documentation, and provide actionable steps to improve the description and tests.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
nillenille

Code Review

Review code diffs for correctness, security, and conventions.

Community
Advanced
caitengweicaitengwei
6

requesting-code-review

Triggers Git-based code review using BASE_SHA and HEAD_SHA ranges.

Community
Intermediate
Kushal9889Kushal9889

husky

Sets up Husky git hooks to automate code quality checks and testing before commits.

Community
Intermediate
anukkrit149anukkrit149

gitnexus-pr-review

Detect code changes in pull requests and map them to affected execution flows and symbols.

Community
Advanced