pr-review

Analyze pull request diffs and commit history for bugs, security risks, and performance issues.

2|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gaebalai/claude-code-kit-ko --skill pr-review-gaebalai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/gaebalai/claude-code-kit-ko/tree/main/.claude/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gaebalai/claude-code-kit-ko --skill pr-review-gaebalai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing Pull Requests, identifying potential issues, and providing constructive feedback, ensuring higher code quality and faster development cycles.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Code Analysis: Scans PR diffs for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and design concerns.
  • Structured Feedback: Categorizes findings into 'must', 'should', and 'nit' for clear prioritization.
  • Use Case: Before merging a critical feature, use this Skill to get a senior engineer's perspective on the code changes, ensuring it meets quality standards and is free of common pitfalls.

Quick Start

Review the pull request at the provided URL and provide feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub PR code review to identify security risks and bugs?

Automated PR code review analyzes pull request changes by scanning git diffs and commit history to identify security risks, bugs, performance issues, and design concerns. It provides structured feedback categorized by severity to ensure higher code quality before merging.

What is the best way to analyze git diffs for performance issues and design concerns?

Analyzing git diffs for performance issues and design concerns involves scanning the code changes to detect potential bottlenecks and structural flaws. This process categorizes findings into 'must', 'should', and 'nit' severities to deliver clear, prioritized, and constructive feedback.

Does this automated code review tool provide feedback categorized by severity?

Yes, this automated code review tool provides structured, constructive feedback categorized by severity. It separates identified bugs, security vulnerabilities, and performance issues into 'must', 'should', and 'nit' priorities for clear actionability.

Can I use this to get a senior engineer's perspective on pull request changes before merging?

Yes, you can use this to get a senior engineer's perspective on pull request changes before merging. It reviews the provided pull request URL, analyzes the changes, and provides feedback to ensure the code meets quality standards and is free of common pitfalls.

How do I review a pull request using just the commit history and diff?

To review a pull request, the tool supports analysis of git diffs and commit history to understand the changes and developer intent. It scans these inputs to identify potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and design concerns, outputting structured feedback.