pr-review-guidelines

Classify pull request feedback into BLOCKER, WARNING, or NIT with confidence scoring.

Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SuperCorks/agent-skills --skill pr-review-guidelines
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review-guidelines
Source: https://github.com/SuperCorks/agent-skills/tree/main/pr-review-guidelines
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SuperCorks/agent-skills --skill pr-review-guidelines

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides structured rubrics and standards to guide developers through high-quality code reviews, ensuring consistent feedback and faster critique loops.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Clear rubric for BLOCKER, WARNING, and NIT classifications.
  • Confidence scoring (0-100) and a reusable review checklist.
  • Generates a structured feedback report to speed up code reviews and onboarding for new engineers.

Quick Start

Use the pr-review-guidelines skill to guide a PR review by applying the rubric and generating a categorized feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review-guidelines

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a code review with clear rubrics?

Structure a code review by applying standardized rubrics that classify feedback into BLOCKER, WARNING, or NIT categories, adding confidence scoring and a checklist to generate a deterministic, actionable feedback report.

What is the difference between a blocker and a nit in code review?

A blocker in code review indicates a critical issue that must be fixed before merging, while a nit represents a minor stylistic or preferential note, with warnings falling between these two extremes in the structured rubric.

How do I standardize pull request feedback across my software projects?

Standardize pull request feedback by applying a fixed set of requirements including clear frontmatter metadata, sections for problem and features, and a categorized feedback report to ensure consistent critique loops.

Can I use a confidence score to improve my code review checklist?

Use a confidence score from 0-100 alongside a reusable review checklist to quantify review certainty, ensuring high-quality code reviews and faster onboarding for new engineers across software projects.

What's the best way to speed up code reviews for new engineers?

Speed up code reviews for new engineers by generating a structured feedback report that applies clear rubrics, enabling faster critique loops and consistent feedback across all software project pull requests.