pr-review

Automated code review for a pull request is achieved by orchestrating parallel subagents that concurrently check for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and spec conformance. This workflow collates evidence from each specialist agent into a unified, inline-friendly report with an overall verdict.

Parallel subagent orchestration delegates a PR review to specialist agents—a PR Reviewer, Security Reviewer, and Verifier—that run concurrently. This mechanism surfaces bugs, security issues, and spec deviations simultaneously, aggregating their evidence-driven findings into one cohesive review verdict.

Reviewing a pull request for security and spec conformance involves running a Security Reviewer and a Verifier agent in parallel alongside a bug checker. These agents evaluate the code changes concurrently and aggregate their findings into a structured, multi-faceted assessment before merging.

Yes, parallel code review handles security-sensitive updates by deploying a dedicated Security Reviewer subagent concurrently with bug and spec conformance checks. This ensures comprehensive coverage for features, fixes, and security patches, producing an aggregated report of any surfaced issues.

The best way to coordinate multiple code review checks is using a deterministic workflow that runs PR, security, and verification subagents concurrently. This enforces a structured review process and collates evidence-driven findings into an aggregated, inline-friendly report.

Yes, providing the PR number and title is required to trigger the parallel review workflow. This input initializes the subagents to locate the code changes and evaluate bugs, security vulnerabilities, and spec conformance to produce the final aggregated report.