pr-review

Generates structured analysis of pull requests highlighting risks and cross-file implications for reviewers.

7|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/milistu/agent-skills --skill pr-review-milistu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/milistu/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/milistu/agent-skills --skill pr-review-milistu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps reviewers quickly understand a pull request by providing a structured explanation of changes, the rationale, and potential risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Clear change summaries: outlines what changed and why.
  • Risk and impact assessment: highlights potential issues and recommended actions.
  • Cross-file reasoning: shows how changes fit together and what to verify in tests.

Quick Start

Provide the PR number or branch name to generate a structured PR analysis and risk assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I summarize pull request changes for code review?

To summarize pull request changes for code review, provide the PR number or branch name to generate a structured analysis. This outlines what changed, the rationale, and cross-file implications to speed up reviews.

What is the best way to assess risks in a pull request?

Assessing risks in a pull request involves highlighting potential issues and cross-file implications with clear references to exact code locations. This structured risk assessment guides reviewers on what to verify in tests.

How do I explain cross-file implications in a pull request?

Explaining cross-file implications in a pull request requires outlining how changes fit together and verifying testing status. This shows reviewers the broader impact of changes across the codebase.

Can I review large pull requests without duplicating PR descriptions?

Yes, you can review large pull requests without duplicating PR descriptions by generating a structured analysis of the rationale and risks. This guides reviewers through changes independently of existing PR text.

When do I need a structured explanation for a pull request?

You need a structured explanation for a pull request when reviewers must quickly understand changes, intent, and potential risks. This is applicable to code review tasks for PRs of varying size.