pr-review

Fetch GitHub pull request metadata and diffs, then categorize findings by severity.

3|Updated Apr 5, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mrp4sten/.dotfiles --skill pr-review-mrp4sten
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/mrp4sten/.dotfiles/tree/main/development/IA/opencode/skill/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mrp4sten/.dotfiles --skill pr-review-mrp4sten

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams review GitHub pull requests with thoughtful, human-centric feedback rather than automated checklists, reducing review cycles and improving code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fetch PR metadata and diffs, filter noise, and highlight high-signal issues and questions.
  • Produce constructive, actionable comments tailored to the PR context, including rationale and suggested next steps.
  • Use cases include reviewing a PR URL or a summary provided by a user, or guiding a PR author on improvements.

Quick Start

Provide a PR URL or number to initiate a code review and receive a detailed, human-oriented assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub pull request reviews with actionable feedback?

Automated GitHub pull request reviews fetch metadata and diffs to evaluate critical issues, categorize findings by severity, and post human-oriented comments with rationale and recommended next steps to reduce review cycles.

Can I review a GitHub pull request using just the PR URL?

Yes, providing a GitHub pull request URL or number initiates the code review process. The system locates the PR, retrieves its diff details, filters noise, and highlights high-signal issues and contextual questions.

How are code review comments categorized by severity?

Code review comments are categorized by severity after evaluating changes for critical issues and potential risks. Findings are filtered to highlight high-signal issues and output as constructive, actionable feedback tailored to the PR context.

Does the PR review process align with existing repository conventions?

Yes, the PR review process aligns with repository conventions. It evaluates contextual questions and outputs comments with rationale and recommended next steps tailored to the specific PR context and repository standards.

What is the best way to guide a PR author on code improvements?

The best way to guide a PR author is by evaluating diff details for potential risks and producing constructive, actionable comments. This feedback includes rationale and suggested next steps aligned with repository conventions.