pr-review

Automate GitHub pull request reviews with Codex agent checks.

26|2|Updated Feb 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sburl/CrossCheck --skill pr-review-sburl
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/sburl/CrossCheck/tree/main/codex/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sburl/CrossCheck --skill pr-review-sburl

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manually reviewing pull requests is slow, inconsistent, and error-prone. This skill automates Codex-driven PR reviews to accelerate feedback and enforce quality gates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated PR assessment: initiates a Codex-based review, surfaces issues, and records findings.
  • Conformance checks: ensures PRs meet repository standards and hooks.
  • Use Case: teams with frequent PRs can programmatically vet changes before merging.

Quick Start

Initiate Codex PR review on the current pull request to generate an actionable merge-readiness report.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request reviews on GitHub?

Automated pull request reviews use the Codex agent to programmatically assess changes, surface issues, and record findings to accelerate feedback and enforce quality gates before merging.

What is Codex agent-based PR review?

Codex agent-based PR review is an autonomous process that initiates a Codex review on a pull request to perform verification, risk assessment, and documentation checks to determine merge readiness.

How do I start a Codex PR review for my current pull request?

To start a Codex PR review, initiate the review process on the current pull request to generate an actionable merge-readiness report that surfaces issues and records findings.

Can I use automated PR review for teams with frequent pull requests?

Automated PR review suits teams with frequent pull requests by programmatically vetting changes, running conformance checks against repository standards, and enforcing quality gates before merging.

Does automated PR review handle verification and risk assessment?

Automated PR review handles verification and risk assessment by applying the Codex agent across software projects to ensure quality, check repository conformance, and provide explicit merge instructions.

Why should I use an automated agent instead of manual PR reviews?

Automated agent reviews replace manual PR reviews because manual reviews are slow, inconsistent, and error-prone, whereas automation accelerates feedback, enforces quality gates, and ensures conformance.