pr-review

Analyze pull request diffs and CI checks for categorized feedback.

2|1|Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Vekta/PolyForge --skill pr-review-vekta
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/Vekta/PolyForge/tree/main/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Vekta/PolyForge --skill pr-review-vekta

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing pull requests, ensuring code quality, security, and adherence to project standards before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Review: Analyzes code changes for coherence, quality, security, and cross-file consistency.
  • CI Status Check: Verifies the status of continuous integration checks.
  • Actionable Feedback: Provides categorized findings (critical, warning, suggestion) and suggests next steps.
  • Use Case: Before merging a new feature, use this Skill to get an automated, unbiased review that catches potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style inconsistencies that the original author might have missed.

Quick Start

Use the pr-review skill to review the current branch's pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request code review for security and quality?

Automated pull request code review analyzes code diffs, CI checks, and project standards to identify security vulnerabilities and quality issues. It provides categorized feedback across critical, warning, and suggestion levels for efficient code quality assurance.

What does an automated PR review check for in a code diff?

An automated PR review checks code diffs for coherence, quality, security vulnerabilities, and cross-file consistency. It also verifies the status of continuous integration checks to ensure comprehensive code quality assurance before merging.

Can I use automated code review to verify CI check status before merging?

Yes, automated code review can verify CI check status. It checks continuous integration statuses alongside analyzing code diffs and project standards to ensure no failing checks are ignored before providing actionable feedback.

How are code analysis findings categorized during a security audit?

Code analysis findings during a security audit are categorized into critical, warning, and suggestion levels. This categorization provides actionable feedback and suggests next steps for efficient code quality assurance and vulnerability remediation.

What is the best way to catch cross-file consistency issues in a pull request?

The best way to catch cross-file consistency issues is using automated pull request review. It analyzes code diffs across multiple files to identify inconsistencies, ensuring adherence to project standards before merging new features.

Does automated code review replace manual checks for project standards adherence?

Automated code review supplements manual checks by providing an unbiased review of project standards adherence. It catches potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style inconsistencies that original authors might miss, but categorized feedback still requires human action.