pr-review

Name: pr-review
Availability: InStock
Author: wildwasser

Automate structured code quality, security, and convention checks on GitHub pull requests.

35|13|Updated Dec 12, 2025

Search Tags:#automation #security #conventions #code-quality #pr #code-review #pull-request

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/wildwasser/opencode-agents --skill pr-review-wildwasser

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-review
Source: https://github.com/wildwasser/opencode-agents/tree/main/.opencode/skills/pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wildwasser/opencode-agents --skill pr-review-wildwasser

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review PRs efficiently by standardizing quality, security, and conventions checks to reduce manual review workload.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured checks for code quality, security, and conventions
Consistent reviewer guidance through a configurable checklist
Accelerated feedback and faster merges by catching issues earlier

Quick Start

Provide a PR URL or number to trigger an automated review and receive a structured feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate pull request reviews for code quality and security?▼

Automating pull request reviews involves applying structured checks for code quality, security, and conventions. This Skill provides a configurable checklist that guides deterministic analysis of GitHub pull requests to catch issues before merging.

Can I use a configurable checklist to standardize PR conventions across projects?▼

Yes, you can standardize PR conventions using a configurable checklist embedded in the Skill. This provides consistent reviewer guidance and ensures code quality, security, and documentation checks are applied uniformly across software projects.

What is the best way to reduce manual code review workload on GitHub pull requests?▼

The best way to reduce manual code review workload is to standardize quality, security, and conventions checks. By automating these governance steps, reviewers receive structured feedback reports that accelerate merging and catch issues earlier.

How do I trigger an automated code review for a specific GitHub pull request?▼

To trigger an automated code review, you provide a GitHub pull request URL or number. The Skill then executes its configurable review steps and returns a structured feedback report assessing code quality, security, and documentation.

Does automated PR governance work for catching security issues before merging?▼

Yes, automated PR governance works for catching security issues before merging by applying structured checks. The Skill assesses security alongside code quality and conventions, enabling reviewers to identify vulnerabilities during the review process.

What are the limitations of using automated checklists for pull request reviews?▼

Automated checklists for pull request reviews provide deterministic analysis based on configured steps but may not catch nuanced contextual issues. They are designed to standardize quality, security, and conventions checks, reducing but not entirely replacing manual reviewer oversight.