skills.rest
WanxiaJaneYang
WanxiaJaneYangCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

pr-reviewer

Review pull requests for correctness, regressions, and missing tests.

Updated Feb 11, 2026
Search Tags:#testing#developer tools#quality assurance#code review#pull request#regression
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WanxiaJaneYang/mvp-agent --skill pr-reviewer-wanxiajaneyang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/WanxiaJaneYang/mvp-agent/tree/main/.agents/skills/pr-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WanxiaJaneYang/mvp-agent --skill pr-reviewer-wanxiajaneyang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing pull requests, ensuring code correctness, identifying regressions, and verifying adequate test coverage.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Code Correctness Analysis: Scans for logic errors, edge cases, and data handling flaws.
  • Regression Detection: Identifies potential issues that might break existing functionality.
  • Test Coverage Gaps: Flags areas lacking sufficient test cases.
  • Use Case: Before merging a new feature, use this Skill to get a detailed report on potential issues and missing tests, ensuring a higher quality release.

Quick Start

Review the pull request changes for correctness and missing tests.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is automated pull request review for code correctness?▼

Pull request review for code correctness scans changes to detect logic errors, edge cases, and data handling flaws. It enforces a risk-focused quality bar to ensure correctness and provide actionable feedback rather than stylistic preferences.

How do I check a pull request for regressions and missing tests?▼

To check a pull request for regressions and missing tests, review the changes using structured analysis to identify potential functionality breaks and flag areas lacking sufficient test cases. This ensures adequate test coverage before merging.

Does this code review approach focus on stylistic preferences or correctness?▼

This code review approach focuses on correctness rather than stylistic preferences. It enforces a quality bar centered on identifying regressions, verifying test coverage gaps, and providing actionable feedback for software development workflows.

Can I use automated code review for risk-focused quality assurance?▼

Yes, you can use automated code review for risk-focused quality assurance in software development workflows. It applies structured analysis to verify code correctness, detect regressions, and ensure sufficient test coverage for a higher quality release.

What are the limitations of automated pull request review?▼

The limitations of automated pull request review include its exclusive focus on correctness, regressions, and test coverage rather than stylistic preferences. It requires existing software development workflows to function and does not generate missing test code automatically.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
ajayjoshi-ciphersonicajayjoshi-ciphersonic

requesting-code-review

Automate code review with static security scanning and baseline-aware quality checks.

Community
Advanced
lucidlabs-hqlucidlabs-hq
2

test

Run unit tests, gather coverage, and block commits until gates pass.

Official
Intermediate
adityaarsharmaadityaarsharma
2

orbit-qa-regression-pack

Manage regression test suites with Playwright and CI pipelines.

Community
Advanced
R2W1csR2W1cs
1

lint-and-validate

Lint and validate JavaScript and Python code for syntax and style issues.

Community
Intermediate