pr-small-cl

Scopes or splits pull requests into self-contained reviewable increments.

6|1|Updated Jul 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jl-cmd/claude-dev-env --skill pr-small-cl-jl-cmd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-small-cl
Source: https://github.com/jl-cmd/claude-dev-env/tree/main/skill-archive/pr-small-cl
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jl-cmd/claude-dev-env --skill pr-small-cl-jl-cmd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Large pull requests are hard to review reliably, slowing down code review and increasing the risk of missed defects. This Skill helps you assess whether a change is too broad and split it into coherent, independently mergeable increments. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Scope Assessment: Evaluate whether a pull request's breadth prevents a reliable review of design, behavior, or verification. - Split Planning: Identify useful seams for splitting, such as preparation refactors, vertical features, layer-specific work, or stacked changes. - Review Response: Record scope, verification, risks, and follow-up work, and respond to reviewer feedback on oversized changes. - Use Case: You have a 2,000-line PR mixing a refactor with a new feature. Use this Skill to separate the refactor into a preparation change and the feature into a follow-up, each safe to merge or revert on its own. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to split this pull request into smaller reviewable increments with clear dependencies between them.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-small-cl

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I split a large pull request into smaller changes?▼

Split a large pull request by choosing seams that give each increment a coherent purpose and test boundary. Common approaches include separating preparation refactors from behavior changes, splitting independent vertical features, or stacking changes where each builds on a stable foundation.

What makes a pull request small enough to review?▼

A reviewable pull request delivers one coherent outcome with its implementation, tests, documentation, and configuration. A reviewer should be able to understand the change with its context and verification, and the system should remain in a usable state.

When should I ask an author to split a pull request?▼

Ask for a split when the change's breadth prevents a reliable assessment of design, behavior, or verification. Identify the first coherent increment and the remaining increments so the author has an actionable path forward.

What are stacked pull requests and when should I use them?▼

Stacked pull requests are a splitting strategy where each earlier change supplies the next change's stable foundation. Use them when increments depend on each other sequentially, and state the dependencies between related pull requests explicitly.

How do I keep split pull requests safe to merge independently?▼

Keep each increment safe by ensuring it leaves the system in a usable state and can be merged or reverted on its own. Each split should have a clear test boundary and include the tests and documentation needed for its outcome.