pr-workflow

Coordinate pull request authoring, review, and merge readiness with gated pipelines.

Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/klaidliadon/claude-plugins --skill pr-workflow-klaidliadon
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pr-workflow
Source: https://github.com/klaidliadon/claude-plugins/tree/main/plugins/pr-workflow/skills/pr-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/klaidliadon/claude-plugins --skill pr-workflow-klaidliadon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you move finished work through the pull request process with the right review gates, formatting, and dependency signals so you do not miss critical checks before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review Path Selection: Distinguishes trivial changes from standard changes so you know when to use the full review pipeline.
  • PR Body Authoring: Shapes a PR description with a human-friendly opening, then a structured audit trail with test results and implementation notes.
  • Chained PR Safety: Makes merge order explicit for stacked or dependent pull requests so upstream requirements are not overlooked.
  • Review Comment Handling: Guides responses to bot and human review comments with the right audit trail and resolution flow.

Quick Start

Use this skill to draft a pull request description for a completed code change and confirm the correct review path before opening the PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about pr-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a pull request description for a completed code change?

To structure a pull request description, start with a human-friendly opening summarizing the intent, followed by a structured audit trail detailing test results and implementation notes for clear review tracking.

How do I manage merge order for chained or dependent pull requests?

Managing merge order for dependent pull requests requires making upstream dependencies explicit. This prevents merging downstream code changes before their required foundational feature work or refactors are safely merged.

When should I skip the full review pipeline for a code change?

You should skip the full review pipeline for trivial changes. Distinguishing trivial changes from standard changes ensures you only apply the complete gated review workflow to substantial feature work or security-sensitive edits.

What is the best way to handle bot and human review comments on GitHub?

The best way to handle review comments is to follow a guided resolution flow. This maintains a clear audit trail while addressing both automated bot checks and human reviewer feedback before merge readiness.

Does this PR workflow approach work for security-sensitive code edits?

This PR workflow approach works for security-sensitive code edits by enforcing a gated review pipeline. It ensures critical checks are systematically applied to high-risk changes before they reach the release management stage.