pragmatic-docs

Clarify and condense project documentation into structured templates with real examples.

Updated Feb 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vmvarela/skills --skill pragmatic-docs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pragmatic-docs
Source: https://github.com/vmvarela/skills/tree/main/skills/pragmatic-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vmvarela/skills --skill pragmatic-docs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Pragmatic Documentation helps teams produce clear, useful project documentation (READMEs, guides, docs/) that respects readers' time by focusing on real examples, decisive guidance, and honest limitations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Start with The Big Idea: present what the project is, why it exists, and who it's for in 1–3 paragraphs.
  • Integrate real examples: weave commands, code, and outputs into the narrative to demonstrate usage.
  • Be honest about trade-offs and limitations: acknowledge constraints and provide actionable guidance.

Quick Start

Create a concise README that presents the big idea, shows a real example, and notes trade-offs in one short page.

Frequently Asked Questions about pragmatic-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write concise project documentation that respects readers' time?

Concise project documentation starts with The Big Idea in 1-3 paragraphs, integrates real examples like commands and code, and honestly notes trade-offs to respect readers' time.

What should a README include to explain why a project exists?

A README should explain why a project exists by presenting The Big Idea: what the project is, why it was created, and who the target audience is within a few paragraphs.

How to structure a CONTRIBUTING.md file with real examples and trade-offs?

Structure CONTRIBUTING.md by weaving real command examples and code outputs into the narrative, then acknowledging constraints and providing actionable guidance regarding trade-offs.

Does this approach work for both READMEs and module docs?

Yes, this documentation approach works for READMEs, module docs, CONTRIBUTING.md, and architecture docs by enforcing The Big Idea, real examples, trade-offs, and a single-sentence Quick Start.

When should I document trade-offs and limitations in software docs?

You should document trade-offs and limitations in software docs to be honest about constraints, providing actionable guidance so readers understand boundaries rather than expecting perfection.