pragmatic-programmer

Orchestrate multi-round code reviews with four reviewers and regression reporting.

3|Updated Jul 5, 2021

Search Tags:#automation #collaboration #validation #regression #code-review #iterative #pragmatic

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/iAziz786/dotfiles --skill pragmatic-programmer-iaziz786

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pragmatic-programmer
Source: https://github.com/iAziz786/dotfiles/tree/main/.agents/skills/pragmatic-programmer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/iAziz786/dotfiles --skill pragmatic-programmer-iaziz786

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The skill orchestrates multi-round, pragmatic code reviews to surface actionable findings, validate results, and drive fixes across cycles, reducing drift and regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Iterative review cycles with four independent reviewers per cycle
Validation rounds that filter findings before consolidation
Consolidation and a single fixer applying validated changes
Built-in ambiguity pauses and ASCII regression reporting for up to five cycles

Quick Start

Give the current project a target branch, activate the pragmatic-programmer skill, and initiate the first review cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions about pragmatic-programmer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate iterative code reviews to catch regressions?▼

Multi-round code reviews use independent reviewers per cycle who surface actionable findings, validate results, and apply fixes to prevent regressions. The workflow pauses for ambiguity and reports regressions in a clear format.

What is a gateable code review workflow for maintainability?▼

A gateable code review workflow enforces structured validation and consolidation rounds before applying fixes, ensuring correctness and maintainability. It cycles through reviews, filters findings, and uses a dedicated fixer to apply only validated changes.

How do I validate code review findings before consolidating fixes?▼

Validating code review findings requires a dedicated validation round that filters outputs from multiple reviewers before consolidation. This ensures only verified actionable findings are passed to a fixer for application, reducing drift across iterative cycles.

Can I run multi-round code reviews without external dependencies?▼

Multi-round iterative code reviews can run without external dependencies, orchestrating up to five cycles with four reviewers internally. The workflow manages validation, consolidation, and fixing autonomously to enforce correctness and maintainability.

What are the limitations of automated iterative code review cycles?▼

Iterative code review cycles are limited to a maximum of five cycles with four reviewers per cycle. The workflow pauses when encountering ambiguity, requiring explicit resolution before continuing validation and regression reporting.

When should I use a pragmatic code review approach over a standard review?▼

A pragmatic code review approach is suited for codebases where maintainability and correctness are priorities, using multi-round validation and a dedicated fixer to reduce drift. Standard reviews lack this iterative validation, consolidation, and automated regression reporting.