skills.rest
coalesce-labs
coalesce-labsOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

prd-review-panel

Coordinate seven parallel sub-agents to review a PRD and synthesize feedback.

20|4|Updated Oct 4, 2025
Search Tags:#parallel#review#synthesis#cross-functional#prd#stakeholders
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/coalesce-labs/catalyst --skill prd-review-panel
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prd-review-panel
Source: https://github.com/coalesce-labs/catalyst/tree/main/plugins/pm/skills/prd-review-panel
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/coalesce-labs/catalyst --skill prd-review-panel

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

PRD reviews often stall due to siloed perspectives and late-stage misalignment. This Skill coordinates seven parallel reviewer personas to surface gaps, risks, and strategic concerns early in the process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel seven-perspective PRD reviews (engineering, design, executive, legal, UX research, skeptic, and customer voice) to surface issues in real time.
  • Centralized synthesis that labels strengths, blockers, gaps, and concrete recommendations for decision-making.
  • Stage-aware evaluation and automated routing of PRD content to relevant stakeholders for timely feedback.

Quick Start

Run the PRD review panel to initiate seven-perspective feedback on a given PRD and retrieve a structured synthesis.

Frequently Asked Questions about prd-review-panel

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get cross-functional PRD review feedback from multiple stakeholders at once?▼

Cross-functional PRD review is orchestrated by routing your document to seven parallel reviewer personas, aggregating their distinct stakeholder perspectives into a single consolidated synthesis of actionable recommendations.

What is the best way to identify blockers and gaps in a PRD before engineering begins?▼

Identifying blockers and gaps in a PRD requires stage-aware evaluation across engineering, design, executive, legal, UX research, skeptic, and customer perspectives to surface late-stage misalignment risks early in the process.

Can I run parallel PRD reviews without manually managing feedback from each stakeholder?▼

You can run parallel PRD reviews without manual stakeholder management by initiating an automated panel that routes the PRD content to seven sub-agents and retrieves a structured synthesis of strengths and gaps.

How does a seven-perspective PRD review synthesis work?▼

A seven-perspective PRD review works by loading your document and reference materials, routing them to seven parallel reviewer personas, and aggregating the feedback into labeled blockers, gaps, and concrete recommendations.

Does the PRD review panel require reference materials to synthesize stakeholder feedback?▼

The PRD review panel does not require reference materials to function, but it will load and incorporate them if available to provide richer context for the seven parallel reviewer personas during synthesis.

When should I avoid using parallel sub-agents for PRD review?▼

You should avoid using parallel sub-agents for PRD review when your document lacks sufficient detail for stage-aware evaluation, as the synthesis relies on routing substantive PRD content to the seven reviewer personas.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
b566776b566776

bmad-product-brief

Draft executive product briefs with YAML frontmatter from user input and reference materials.

Community
Advanced
a747895159a747895159

project-research

Coordinate research sub-agents and sources to produce consolidated reports.

Community
Advanced
coalesce-labscoalesce-labs
20

prototype-feedback

Analyze structured prototype feedback and generate prioritized iteration plans.

Official
Advanced
multicammulticam

Validator Agent Pattern

Cross-check implementations against PRD requirements and generate validation reports.

Community
Advanced