Coordinate multi-pass PRD reviews to surface prioritized gaps and inconsistencies.
npx skills add https://github.com/thrawn01/claude-dotfiles --skill prd-review-thrawn01
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: prd-review Source: https://github.com/thrawn01/claude-dotfiles/tree/main/skills/prd-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thrawn01/claude-dotfiles --skill prd-review-thrawn01
This Skill helps product teams quickly identify gaps, inconsistencies, and ambiguities in a PRD by coordinating multi-pass reviews that surface actionable issues for the next steps.
Run the PRD-review skill to initiate iterative, four-pass analysis and surface actionable changes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To identify gaps in a PRD, coordinate a multi-pass review across PRD sections, ADRs, and CONTEXT glossary to surface inconsistencies and ambiguities. This process prioritizes findings with P0, P1, or P2 levels to drive product decisions.
The best way to review a PRD for scope drift is applying a four-pass analysis: review, validation, skeptic, and fix proposal. This cross-references tech specs and ADRs to surface actionable findings and concrete edits for resolution.
Multi-agent PRD gap analysis works by executing four iterative passes: review, validation, skeptic, and fix proposal. It cross-references the PRD, ADRs, and CONTEXT glossary to output concrete edits, rationale, and recommended next steps.
Yes, you can cross-reference ADRs and a CONTEXT glossary during a PRD review. The multi-pass analysis checks these documents alongside the tech spec to ensure scope alignment and surface actionable inconsistencies for resolution.
You prioritize PRD review findings by assigning P0, P1, or P2 severity levels to identified gaps and ambiguities. This provides concrete PRD edits and user questions to drive product decisions and resolve scope issues efficiently.
Automated PRD consistency checks are limited to surfacing actionable findings and proposing fixes based on existing documents. They cannot make final product decisions; they output concrete edits and user questions for human resolution of gaps.
hgxszhjGenerate a production-ready PRD from conversation context and codebase understanding.
clawpod-appGenerate a structured PRD from a vague idea or user request.
wilddeerReview code changes against spec requirements and output a structured verdict.
tyevansFacilitate team planning sessions to decompose goals into sprint-ready tasks with assignments.
