prd-stress-test

Stress-testing a PRD involves running parallel market-fit, feasibility, and scope assessments to surface gaps and risky requirements early. The multi-agent review consolidates these perspectives to ensure your product plan is actually ready for implementation.

Validating MVP scope requires sizing V1 using MVP principles to flag scope creep and label features as MUST-HAVE, CUT FROM V1, or DEFER TO V2. This structured review prevents over-scoping by evaluating your requirements against strict build boundaries.

Checking technical feasibility involves reviewing requirements clarity, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and integration points within your PRD. This process prevents building an unbuildable spec by identifying ambiguous technical requirements early in product planning.

Cross-reference conflict detection compares reviewer outputs to catch contradictions in your PRD, such as critical differentiation features being accidentally cut or must-have features lacking clarity. This step ensures the final requirements document is internally consistent before implementation.

Yes, you can use a single markdown document for PRD requirements validation by providing the file path to the review system. The multi-agent review reads the markdown path, spawns three reviewers, and produces a verdict with a revision checklist based on that document.

Multi-agent review for product planning is not suitable when you lack a finalized PRD markdown document or need a rapid, informal review. The process requires a complete PRD path to properly assess market fit, technical feasibility, and MVP scope across multiple dimensions.