prd-technical-requirements

Draft measurable technical requirements in a standardized PRD format.

10|2|Updated Feb 9, 2026

Search Tags:#compliance #engineering #prd #technical requirements #slo #non-functional

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills --skill prd-technical-requirements

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prd-technical-requirements
Source: https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills/tree/main/plugins/trogonstack-product-requirements/skills/prd-technical-requirements
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills --skill prd-technical-requirements

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the common gap in product requirements documents where non-functional constraints like performance, security, and reliability are left vague or ignored, leading to engineering misalignment.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Constraint Capture: Guides the user through 11 critical technical categories including performance, scale, security, and compliance.
Standardized Output: Generates a formal technical requirements document at a specific project path, ensuring consistency across the organization.
Use Case: When preparing for engineering planning, use this skill to force explicit definitions of p95 latency targets, SLOs, and data classification, preventing ambiguous requirements like "the system should be fast."

Quick Start

Use the prd-technical-requirements skill to draft the technical requirements for the current project by following the guided discovery prompts.

Frequently Asked Questions about prd-technical-requirements

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I define non-functional requirements for a PRD to prevent engineering misalignment?▼

To define non-functional requirements for a PRD, you must capture measurable constraints across 11 critical categories including performance, scale, security, and compliance. This ensures technical requirements are testable and prevents ambiguous targets like "the system should be fast."

What is the best way to document SLOs and p95 latency targets for engineering planning?▼

The best way to document SLOs and p95 latency targets is using a standardized PRD format that forces explicit definitions of reliability and performance constraints. This generates a formal technical requirements document at a specific project path for organizational consistency.

How do I structure technical constraints for platform specifications and data classification?▼

You structure technical constraints by following guided discovery prompts that capture platform specifications and data classification systematically. This process translates vague non-functional constraints into measurable, testable technical requirements documented formally.

Does this technical requirements drafting process work for compliance and security targets?▼

Yes, this technical requirements drafting process specifically supports compliance and security targets by guiding you through dedicated categories for these constraints. It ensures all security and compliance specifications are explicitly defined, measurable, and testable within the final document.

Why do my product requirements documents lack measurable technical constraints?▼

Your product requirements documents lack measurable technical constraints because non-functional requirements like performance and reliability are often left vague or ignored. This gap causes engineering misalignment when explicit definitions for SLOs and data classification are not enforced.