pre-pr-review

Run three parallel AI reviews cross-verified against Microsoft Learn documentation for skill pull requests.

14|3|Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/patrikborosch/AnalyticsPlatformAgents --skill pre-pr-review-patrikborosch
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pre-pr-review
Source: https://github.com/patrikborosch/AnalyticsPlatformAgents/tree/main/creator/.github/skills/pre-pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/patrikborosch/AnalyticsPlatformAgents --skill pre-pr-review-patrikborosch

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Submitting skill pull requests with undetected issues leads to long review cycles, rejected PRs, and wasted maintainer time. Manual self-reviews often miss correctness errors, outdated documentation links, and structural compliance gaps that reviewers routinely flag.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 3-Model Parallel Review: Runs three independent reviews across different AI models to reduce the ~40% false-positive rate common in single-pass reviews.
  • Cross-Verification Against Microsoft Learn: All findings are validated against official Microsoft documentation to eliminate incorrect flags and ensure accuracy.
  • Consolidated Actionable Findings: Merges, deduplicates, and prioritizes issues into a clear list for you to fix before pushing, avoiding review ping-pong.
  • Use Case: If you are submitting a skill PR for a Microsoft Fabric analytics tool, run this skill after local pre-PR checks to catch API path errors, deprecated documentation URLs, and governance rule violations before a maintainer reviews your work.

Quick Start

Use the pre-pr-review skill to run a cross-verified self-review of your skill PR before submitting it for maintainer review.

Frequently Asked Questions about pre-pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I catch errors in a Microsoft Fabric pull request before submitting it?

Pre-submission self-reviews catch Microsoft Fabric pull request errors by running three independent parallel AI code reviews and cross-verifying findings against official Microsoft Learn documentation. This process identifies API path errors, deprecated URLs, and structural compliance gaps before maintainer review.

Why does my manual code review miss deprecated documentation links in skill PRs?

Manual code review misses deprecated documentation links because single-pass reviews suffer from a high false-positive rate. Cross-verification against official Microsoft Learn documentation validates findings, ensuring documentation fidelity and eliminating incorrect flags that human reviewers routinely miss.

How do I validate skill correctness and governance rule compliance for Microsoft Fabric repositories?

Validate skill correctness and governance rule compliance for Microsoft Fabric repositories by executing three independent parallel reviews across different AI models. This consolidated approach deduplicates and prioritizes issues, ensuring high-confidence pre-submission alignment with repository governance rules.

Does running multiple AI model reviews reduce false positives in pre-PR code checks?

Running multiple AI model reviews reduces false positives in pre-PR code checks by executing three independent parallel reviews across different AI models. This multi-model approach lowers the common single-pass false-positive rate and produces consolidated, actionable findings.

Can I use automated cross-verification for Microsoft Learn documentation links in my PR?

Automated cross-verification for Microsoft Learn documentation links validates all review findings against official Microsoft documentation. This eliminates incorrect flags, ensures documentation fidelity, and verifies that API paths and URLs are current before submission.

What is the best way to avoid review ping-pong when submitting skill pull requests?

Avoid review ping-pong when submitting skill pull requests by running a cross-verified self-review that merges, deduplicates, and prioritizes issues into a clear list. Fixing these consolidated actionable findings before pushing prevents rejected PRs and wasted maintainer time.