What problem does it solve? Free-flowing idea discussions lose decisions the moment the conversation moves on, forcing teams to re-interview stakeholders before any build planning can start. This Skill captures every settled decision into a structured scope doc the moment it settles, so /blueprint can consume settled ground instead of re-asking questions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Harvest-before-asking interview: Mines the existing conversation and repo docs first, then asks only numbered, batched frontier questions whose answers could plausibly differ from the given recommendations. - Tagged decision ledger: Records every line as decided, assumed, or parked (needs research, needs prototype, waiting on something), with an out-of-scope channel for rejected options, written to docs/scope/<date>-<idea>.md. - Cold-read exit test: Optionally summons fresh-context readers (Claude subagent or external models like GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen) to report confusions in the scope doc, with verbatim output captured to a review doc. - Use Case: After a long chat fleshing out a new feature, invoke /precon to triage the idea (napkin, bounded, or architectural), run a few rounds of numbered questions, and end with a scope doc ready for /blueprint. ## Quick Start Type /precon after discussing an idea to harvest the conversation into a scope doc through a short round of numbered questions.