What problem does it solve? When a multi-question decision walkthrough has been surfaced but the decision is genuinely unclear, a concise "framing + options + recommendation" format lacks the depth needed to weigh tradeoffs. This Skill re-issues the walkthrough with full per-option rationale so the decision-maker can evaluate every choice on its strongest merits before locking. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Steel-Man Defenses: Every option receives its strongest honest defense with evidence and precedent references, never a strawman. - Honest Weakness Sections: Each option's real gaps and failure modes are admitted without false balance or contrived symmetry. - Synthesis with Strength-of-Lean: Per-question synthesis ties recommendations to established discipline patterns and marks each as strongly held, lightly held, or genuinely uncertain. - Use Case: After a walkthrough on architecture migration options is presented and the user says "I genuinely don't know what to choose," invoke this Skill to re-present all options with full defenses, weaknesses, and a summary recommendation table. ## Quick Start Invoke the skill by saying "present and defend the options from the last walkthrough" after a multi-question decision has been surfaced but not yet locked.
