prime-vector

Turn ambiguous problems into challenged strategy and evidence-bounded next actions.

Updated Jul 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/srinitude/skills --skill prime-vector
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prime-vector
Source: https://github.com/srinitude/skills/tree/main/skills/prime-vector
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/srinitude/skills --skill prime-vector

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Prime Vector helps with hard, ambiguous, or high-stakes decisions when you need strategy instead of a quick answer. It keeps the user in charge while turning rough notes, disputed assumptions, and strategic choices into a measurable plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Strategic framing: Clarifies the real goal, constraints, stakes, and success threshold before proposing a route.
  • Challenge and comparison: Produces a concrete draft, tests the weakest assumption, and compares options against the status quo and viable alternatives.
  • Evidence-bounded decision support: Separates claims from facts, defines reversible tests, and distinguishes proof from accepted uncertainty.
  • Safe execution boundaries: Supports workflow redesign, stakeholder reasoning, repeatable work, and behavior testing without replacing the user's judgment.

Quick Start

Ask Prime Vector to help you choose the highest-value strategy for a hard decision and provide any rough notes, constraints, and desired outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions about prime-vector

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn ambiguous strategic decisions into evidence-bounded next actions?

To turn ambiguous strategic decisions into evidence-bounded next actions, you can frame the problem using CRIT methodology, challenge the weakest assumptions through draft-versus-alternative comparison, and define reversible tests to separate proven facts from accepted uncertainty.

What is the best way to test disputed assumptions in high-stakes workflow redesign?

Testing disputed assumptions in high-stakes workflow redesign requires separating claims from facts, defining reversible tests, and comparing a concrete draft strategy against the status quo and viable alternatives to establish proof while preserving user judgment.

Can I use this approach for stakeholder behavior reasoning and repeatable execution?

Yes, you can apply this approach to stakeholder behavior reasoning and repeatable execution by establishing safe execution boundaries that support behavior testing and strategy validation without replacing the user's final judgment.

How do I start building a tested strategy from rough notes and constraints?

To start building a tested strategy from rough notes and constraints, provide your desired outcome and any initial materials to initiate strategic framing, which clarifies the real goal, constraints, stakes, and success threshold before proposing a route.

When should I not use automated decision support for strategic choices?

You should not use automated decision support for strategic choices when the situation requires preserving human judgment, as this approach is designed to challenge strategy and bound evidence rather than replace the user's own decision-making authority.