One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/barkleesanders/claude-code-starter --skill printing-press-output-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: printing-press-output-review
Source: https://github.com/barkleesanders/claude-code-starter/tree/main/skills/printing-press-output-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/barkleesanders/claude-code-starter --skill printing-press-output-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Rule-based automated checks for printed CLI output miss plausibility bugs that only become obvious during real user interaction, such as semantically irrelevant results, silent source drops in aggregation commands, broken ranking logic, and uncaught formatting errors that can ship bad output to end users.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Semantic relevance validation: Catches output that contains query terms but is not actually relevant to the user's request, slipping past mechanical substring checks.
  • Aggregation integrity checks: Identifies silent drops of requested sources in fan-out commands that rule-based checks do not detect.
  • Ranking and format bug detection: Flags broken top-N sort results, mojibake, malformed URLs, and other formatting issues that escape standard rule-based validation. Use case: This skill is integrated into the printing-press shipcheck Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish diagnostic workflows to catch output issues before CLI tools are published, preventing user-facing bugs from reaching production.

Quick Start

Invoke this internal skill as part of the printing-press or printing-press-polish workflow to automatically review sampled CLI output for plausibility bugs that rule-based checks cannot catch.

Frequently Asked Questions about printing-press-output-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I catch CLI output bugs that rule-based validation misses?

To catch CLI output bugs that rule-based validation misses, you need an agentic review process that checks sampled output for semantic relevance mismatches, silent source drops, and broken ranking logic during shipcheck workflows.

Why does my CLI command return query terms but still produce irrelevant output?

Irrelevant CLI output containing query terms happens when mechanical substring checks pass but semantic relevance fails. Agentic output review detects these plausibility bugs by evaluating whether results actually match the user's request intent.

What is the best way to validate CLI output before publishing command line tools?

The best way to validate CLI output before publishing is integrating an agentic review step into your polish phase to flag uncaught formatting errors, malformed URLs, and mojibake that escape standard rule-based checks.

How do I detect silent source drops in CLI aggregation commands?

Detecting silent source drops in CLI aggregation commands requires aggregation integrity checks that verify all requested sources are present in the fan-out results, which automated rule-based checks do not identify.

Does automated CLI output review work with existing shipcheck workflows?

Yes, agentic CLI output review integrates into existing shipcheck and polish diagnostic workflows, automatically reviewing sampled output to catch edge case plausibility bugs before CLI tools reach production.

What types of formatting issues escape rule-based CLI output validation?

Formatting issues that escape rule-based CLI output validation include broken top-N sort results, mojibake, and malformed URLs, which require agentic plausibility checking to identify before user interaction.