prioritization-frameworks

Compares and applies nine product prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, Kano, and Opportunity Score.

Updated Aug 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Choi-Keith/skill-arsenal-ultra --skill prioritization-frameworks-choi-keith
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prioritization-frameworks
Source: https://github.com/Choi-Keith/skill-arsenal-ultra/tree/main/plugins/pm-skills/pm-execution/skills/prioritization-frameworks
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Choi-Keith/skill-arsenal-ultra --skill prioritization-frameworks-choi-keith

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Product managers often struggle to choose the right prioritization method for a given decision, defaulting to gut feel or misapplying frameworks like RICE where Opportunity Score fits better. This Skill provides a structured reference of nine prioritization frameworks with formulas, applicability guidance, and templates. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Framework Selection Guide: A comparison table of nine frameworks (Eisenhower, Impact vs Effort, Risk vs Reward, Opportunity Score, Kano, Weighted Decision Matrix, ICE, RICE, MoSCoW) with best-fit scenarios for each. - Formulas and Scoring Models: Detailed formulas for Opportunity Score (Importance × (1 − Satisfaction)), ICE (Impact × Confidence × Ease), and RICE ((Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort). - Templates and Further Reading: Links to Google Sheets/Slides templates for ICE, RICE, and Importance vs Satisfaction surveys, plus curated articles on Kano and continuous discovery. - Use Case: When deciding between two competing roadmap initiatives, use this Skill to select ICE for a quick triage or RICE for a rigorous cross-team comparison, then apply the linked spreadsheet template. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to recommend and apply the right prioritization framework for your list of product opportunities using the prioritization-frameworks reference.

Frequently Asked Questions about prioritization-frameworks

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I choose between RICE and ICE for feature prioritization?

Use ICE (Impact × Confidence × Ease) for quick prioritization of ideas and initiatives. Use RICE when you need finer granularity at scale, since it splits Impact into Reach and per-customer Impact and divides by Effort in person-months.

What is the Opportunity Score formula in product management?

Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction), with both values normalized to 0–1 from customer surveys. High importance combined with low satisfaction indicates the best opportunities, prioritizing customer problems rather than solutions.

When should I use the Kano model instead of RICE?

Use Kano to understand user expectations by classifying features as basic, performance, delighter, indifferent, or reverse. It is a comprehension tool rather than a ranking method, so pair it with RICE or ICE for actual ordering.

Should I prioritize features or customer problems?

Prioritize customer problems (opportunities), not features. The core principle is to never let customers design solutions; rank problems by importance and satisfaction, then let the team design solutions for the highest-scoring opportunities.

What are the limitations of the MoSCoW method?

MoSCoW sorts requirements into Must, Should, Could, and Won't buckets but lacks quantitative scoring, making ties hard to break. It originates from project management rather than product discovery, so it suits scope negotiation more than opportunity assessment.