prism-full

A 3-pass adversarial analysis is a sequential validation workflow that produces an initial structural analysis, actively breaks that output with counter-evidence, and synthesizes a corrected conclusion to resolve disagreements.

To audit an analysis for overclaims and underclaims, apply an adversarial break pass that targets the initial structural output with concrete counter-evidence, then revise classifications based on the evidence.

Use a full prism analysis when you need rigorous validation of complex reasoning, such as testing structural claims, identifying wrong predictions, and converting an initial structured argument into a hardened, defensible conclusion.

Derive refined conservation laws by running a final synthesis pass that resolves disagreements between the initial structural analysis and the adversarial break, outputting a corrected conservation law and meta-law.

The best way to test structural claims is sequential execution of a structural analysis pass followed by an adversarial refutation pass, producing a definitive structural-versus-changeable classification table to validate reliability.

No external dependencies are required to run an l12 structural analysis, as the workflow operates sequentially through its internal reasoning passes without external components.